|
telescopeѲptics.net
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪▪▪▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪ CONTENTS
1.3.1.
Gaussian approximation

In the paraxial, or Gaussian approximation,
the image of a point is assumed to be formed by rays close to
optical axis, so that sine of the angle practically equals the angle
itself (in radians). Replacing sine by the angle simplifies the
expressions for refraction and reflection, allowing for quick, yet
accurate assessment of basic spatial and geometric image properties,
derived from the pupil-to-image separation. Since it effectively uses
only a small central portion of the optical surface, it does not provide
information on image quality, i.e. aberrations. In aberration-free
systems, Gaussian and actual focus coincide.
Image separation for an imaging surface, refracting or reflecting, is obtained from this basic equation relating object
distance O, single optical surface radius of curvature R
and image-to-surface separation I:

with n
and n'
being the refractive index before and after reflection
or refraction, respectively. In other words, n is the index of
incident medium, and n' is index of the refractive or reflective
medium, either positive for light traveling from left to right, and
negative for the opposite direction (also, according to the
sign convention,
object or image distance is negative when to the left from surface,
positive when to the right).
For given surface radius
R, image and object distance are in inverse relation; the image
of farther away objects is closer to the objective. As the object
distance O approaches infinity, image distance I reduces to the focal
length I=R/(1-n/n')=ƒ.
The appropriate focal point is called paraxial, or
Gaussian focus.
This relation is derived from the geometry of refracting (or reflecting)
ray, illustrated below, for reflecting and refracting surface of
similar radius of curvature.

FIGURE 7: The geometry of refraction/reflection leading into the
fundamental relation of Gaussian approximation. O and I
are object and image distance, respectively, n and n' are
index of refraction before and after refraction/reflection,
respectively, and R is surface radius of curvature;
φ is field angle,
α
is angle of incidence to surface normal,
δ
is angle of normal to the axis,
α' is angle to the surface
normal of refracted/reflected ray and
φ' is angle of
refracted/reflected ray to the axis.
The subscripts G
and M are for "mirror" and "glass",
respectively.
In the paraxial approximation,
angles are small enough that their sines correlate as the angles
themselves. Thus the Snell law of refraction, nsin α=n'sinα'
simplifies to nα=n'α',
leading to the equality δ=αa+α=α'+ι,
with δ
being the angle between the surface normal and the axis,
αa
and α
the incident ray angle with the axis and surface normal,
respectively, α'
the angle of refracted/reflected ray to the normal, and
ι the
angle of the refracted/reflected ray with the axis. Expressing
α and α'
in terms of the other two angles and substituting into the simplified
Snell's law gives n'ι-nαa=(n'-n)δ
which, after replacing the angles with the appropriate height/distance
ratio (the common height cancels out), leads into Eq. 1.
Gaussian
approximation is strictly valid only for rays very close to the optical axis - paraxial
rays - and used to determine their points of convergence. In principle,
these points coincide with the points of convergence of a perfect
(aberration-free) system. While Gaussian approximation does not provide
direct information about image aberrations, it is a quick, practical way
of determining location of the paraxial focus of an optical surface, or
element.
For thin lens in air, first surface
indici are n=1
for light traveling from left to right, and n'=nG,
nG being the glass refractive index, so the relation applied to
the first surface becomes

I1
being the front surface to (its) image separation, and R1
being the front surface radius of curvature. For very distant object,
1/O is infinitely small, and its image forms at a distance I1=nR1/(n-1)
from the first surface. This is now the object distance O for the
second surface (n=nG
and n'=1),
which will form the final image at a distance I2,
equal to the lens'
focal length ƒl according to (1/I2)=1/ƒ=[(nG-1)/R1]-(nG-1)/R2,
which comes to:

This expression
is referred to as thin lens equation, or
lensmaker's formula. It can be also written
in direct terms as
ƒl= R1R2/(nG-1)(R2-R1).
Note that in the standard right-hand
Cartesian coordinate
system distances to the left are negative, and those to the right
positive; consequently, biconvex lens has the front radius positive and
the rear radius negative.
Mirror focal length ƒm,
after substituting n=1
and n'=-1
(for incident light traveling from left to right, according to the
sign
convention) in Eq. 1, resulting in (1/I)=-2/R=1/ƒm,
is defined as:

with Rm
being the mirror radius of curvature. According to the sign convention,
both, mirror radius of curvature and its focal length are numerically
negative. While it is usually applied to the radius, mirror focal length
is often given positive, for practical reasons.
Relation between object distance O,
image separation I and objective's focal length
ƒ can be expressed in a general form given by
the Gaussian lens formula as:

It is also valid for mirrors and objectives in general, under the
same assumption that object distance and focal length of a converging
cone are both numerically positive, with image separation being
determined according to their specific values (positive for O>ƒ,
negative - indicating diverging imaging cone - for O<ƒ). This is not
necessarily in
accordance with every sign convention, but is used for convenience when
finding these distances is the sole purpose of calculation.
For very distant objects, 1/O
approaches zero, and O/(I+O) approaches 1, with the focal length ƒ and image separation I
practically coinciding. Evidently, the relation directly implies
that the closer the object, the farther from the objective its
image.
Note that the above formula applies when the
imaging medium is air. In general, focal length is defined by ƒ=nIO/(I+O), with n being the
refractive index of the imaging medium. Hence, nominal focal
length increases with the medium refractive index. However, due to the
change in effective wavelength - which compresses in a denser media, and
vice versa, resulting in correspondingly smaller diffraction pattern,
the effective focal length remains identical to that in air, i.e.
smaller by a factor of n (an example being the optical system of
human eye).
From Eq. 1, paraxial image distance formed by a
single refractive or reflective surface of radius R, for object space
refractive index n and image space refractive index n' is
I=n'/[(n/O)+(n'-n)/R]. For a lens in collimated light, n/O is zero for
the first surface, and image formed by it effectively becomes object for
the second surface, with the latter forming the final image if this
object at the distance equaling focal length. Denoting refractive indici
from the object space to the image space as n1,
n1'
(at the front lens' surface) and n2,
n2'
(at the rear surface), the focal length is given by ƒ=n2'/{[(n2'-n2)/R2]+(n1'-n1)n1/n1'R1},
with R1
and R2
being the front and rear surface radius of curvature, respectively.
Alternately, it can be expressed as a complete (thick
lens) formula, for n0,
n1,
n2
being the refractive index of object space, lens and image space,
respectively, 1/ƒ=[(n1-n0)/n2R1]-(n1-n2)/(n2R2)[1-(n1-n0)t/n1R1],
where t is the lens axial thickness. For relatively small t,
analogously to lens immersed in air, it simplifies to a thin lens
formula, 1/ƒ=[(n1-n0)/n2R1]-(n1-n2)/(n2R2).
◄
1.3.
Optical system of a telescope
▐
2. MAIN FUNCTIONS OF A TELESCOPE
►
Home
| Comments |