telescopeѲptics.net
.......................................................................................... CONTENTS
2.3. Telescope magnification
Telescope
magnification is a ratio of the image size produced on
the retina by a telescope, versus retinal image size of the naked eye.
As FIG. 6 shows, image
size on the retina in both cases is proportional to the apparent angle
of view, giving telescope magnification as Mt=
ε/α, ε
and α
being the apparent and true (semi) angle of view, respectively. For
sufficiently small ε,
the angles relate nearly as their tangents. Replacing the two angles
- with their tangents (tanε=h'/ƒ'
and tanα=h'/ƒ)
gives telescope magnification as:
Mt =
ƒ/ƒ' (3)
Since this
relation assumes small angle of view, it is strictly accurate only for
small angular objects, not larger than about 10 degrees in the eyepiece.
With the tangent increasing faster than the angle, large angular objects
in the eyepiece will have lower actual magnification than indicated by
this formula. For instance, a 1 arc minute object magnified to 1°
apparent size will have actual magnification of 60, exactly as the
formula indicates. But a 30 arc minute object magnified to 30° apparent
size will also have actual magnification of 60, while the formula
indicates 61.4.
Telescope magnification can be split
into two components: (1) magnification of the objective and
(2)
magnification of the eyepiece. Magnification of the image formed by
the objective is either relative to the object imaged (absolute, or optical
magnification), or relative to its apparent size in the naked eye
(apparent magnification). The former is expressed with a simple formula:
Mo=
ƒ/(o-ƒ)
(3.1)
with f being the telescope focal length, and o
the object distance (FIG. 5).
Obviously, it is very small for astronomical objects, due to their
enormous distances. Apparent magnification of the objective is given by
the ratio of the viewing angle of its object-image from the least distance
of distinct vision v (250mm average) to the viewing angle of the object
observed directly. Since these angles are sufficiently small, they can
be replaced with their tangents, giving the apparent objective
magnification as
Ma=ƒ/250
(3.2)
for the focal length f in mm.
The eyepiece effectively allows the eye
to observe the object-mage formed by the objective from the distance of
eyepiece focal length
(ƒ' in Fig. 6). It makes the image apparently larger by a factor
Me=
ε/β,
with ε
and
b
being the apparent viewing angle in the eyepiece and in the naked eye
(the latter also called "true" angle, or field of view),
respectively (Fig. 5-6).
Again, for small to moderate viewing angle ε, we can replace angles with their tangents (tanβ=h'/V~h'/250
for h' in mm), giving the eyepiece magnification factor as
Me~250/ƒ'
(3.3)
for
the eyepiece f.l. ƒ' in mm. Thus, telescope magnification is a product
of the two magnifications - the initial apparent magnification by the objective,
and the final one by the eyepiece - resulting in Mt=MaMe~ƒ/ƒ'.
Of course, the eyepiece magnifies by enlarging the incoming ray angle,
but produces collimated beams and, thus, no actual image. It is the eye
that transform each of these beams into a point image.
As noted, for large viewing angles in the eyepiece, use of the tangent
results in higher than actual magnification figure. For instance, a 5mm
high object-image on the optical axis is viewed through a 50mm f.l.
eyepiece at an angle
α
given by tanα=5/50,
giving α=5.7
degrees apparent viewing angle. And that same object-image observed
through a 10mm f.l. eyepiece has the apparent viewing angle
α'=26.6
degrees. While the tangent (i.e. eyepiece f.l.) based magnification
factor is 5, actual magnification factor for the 10mm vs. 50mm eyepiece
is 26.6/5.7=4.7.
While there is no
single optimum magnification for all types of astronomical objects and
individuals, there is a range of so called useful magnification. On the low side of
this range, the limit is set by the size of eye pupil. It is not to be
smaller than the "exit pupil" of a telescope - an image of the entrance
pupil (objective) formed by the eyepiece. Exit pupil appears as a bright
circle of light floating in front the eyepiece eye lens (the eyepiece lens facing the eye). In
order to capture all the light entering telescope, the eye lens has to
be placed at the location of exit pupil and, of course, in order to
avoid light loss, eye pupil
has to be at least as wide as the exit pupil. Since exit pupil diameter is given by
P=D/Mt=ƒ'/F,
the lowest magnification that still preserves
light-gathering power is Mt=D/ƒ'. For an average eye pupil maximum of
6mm, it comes to D/6 for D in mm.
Limit to magnification increase is set
primarily by image imperfections, but also by dimming, loss of field,
vibrations and eye physiology. As we have seen, even perfect optics will
not produce perfect images, due to the effect of
diffraction.
Point-object image is smeared into a pattern of finite size. Magnified
enough (to about 4 to 5 arc minutes) it becomes visible to the eye, and
there is no benefit in resolution from further magnification increase.
Taking the standard resolution limit for a pair of near equally bright
point sources of 4.5/D (D in inches) arc seconds,
needed magnification to 5 arc minutes apparent center separation for a
pair of relatively bright point-object images at the resolution limit is given as ~67D,
or 67x per inch of aperture (~2.7D for D in mm).
However, just as the
"standard" resolution limit is strictly valid only for a very particular
object type, as explained above, so is the high magnification limit
derived from it. Some objects - generally those with lower inherent
contrast - will dictate lower maximum useful
magnification, while some other objects will require higher. Practical limit to useful magnification on the high
side will be lower, the larger aperture the more so - due to increase in
wavefront aberrations in general, and especially so called "seeing
error": the deterioration of image quality caused by atmospheric turbulence.
Not to forget, optimum magnification varies rather significantly
individually, due to differences in eyesight quality and observing
experience.
◄
2.2. Telescope resolution
▐
3. TELESCOPE ABERRATIONS
►
Home
| Comments |