|
telescopeѲptics.net
.......................................................................................... CONTENTS
◄
8.4. Off-axis and tilted element telescopes 1
▐
8.4.1. Off-axis Newtonian 2
► 8.4.1. Off-axis NewtonianOff-axis Newtonian uses an off-axis mirror segment cut out of a larger paraboloid (parent mirror), so that it focuses outside the incoming pencil of light (FIG. 70). The parent mirror has to be paraboloidal; off-axis segment from any other conic would suffer from spherical aberration, as well as from tilt induced center field
FIGURE 70: Off-axis segment of a paraboloid focuses pencil of incoming light out of its path. Reflecting flat directing converging light to a more convenient location is also out of the incoming light path, allowing unobstructed system. The parent mirror is usually ~ƒ/4, which is about the upper limit to its relative aperture, both, in regard to econo production and the amount of aberration leftover in the off-axis segment mirror (usually f/10 to f/12 effective f-ratio). Segment of any other conic would produce axial aberrations. coma and astigmatism, the farther from paraboloid, the more so (it is obvious for a sphere, whose any off-axis section is, in fact, a smaller sphere tilted with respect to the incoming light). The question is how much of the aberration of the parent mirror - and in what form - is passed onto its off-axis segment. The usual guess is that the main off-axis aberration of an off-axis section is also coma, only somewhat reduced. A glance at the aberrated wavefront of the parent mirror reveals that it is not so (FIG. 71). While the wavefront profile for the segment could be determined by recalculating the coma pupil function for the segment area, it is easier and more illustrative to have it extracted from major points of the existing wavefront, assuming - with a degree of approximation - that the wavefront segment is purely astigmatic (that is, neglecting the low coma component).
FIGURE 71: Along the axis of aberration, comatic wavefront deviation for a full aperture mirror has two lobe-like formations of opposite signs. Deformation of the portion of the wavefront reflected from an off-axis segment - green shaded - is mostly astigmatic, despite it being originating from mainly comatic deformation of the wavefront as a whole. Section of the wavefront reflected from the segment will have the radius along the axis of aberration - imaginary central vertical line on the plot - more strongly curved than in the direction perpendicular to it. The P-V wavefront error of the segment is determined by the P-V wavefront error of the appropriate portion of the comatic wavefront over its effective pupil (aperture). Since this astigmatic wavefront deformation originates from the parent mirror coma, it changes linearly, with the field angle - not with the square of it, as astigmatism does when it originates from the incoming wavefront being tilted with respect to the optical surface (which is the "usual" astigmatism form for off-axis image points). Variation of wavefront profile with the wavefront incoming angle also produces peculiar image field. With this assumption, the P-V error is determined by the peak aberration of the "parent" mirror wavefront along its axis of aberration, on one hand, and the segment size and position with respect to the wavefront on the other (FIG. 72). This is not a strict analysis - rather informal one and with approximate results, but still worthwhile following through.
FIGURE 72: Wavefront profile along the axis of aberration (dotted green) for the parent mirror wavefront over the pupil radius d is a basis for calculating approximate P-V error of astigmatism (as the dominant aberration) in an off-axis section mirror. Perfect reference sphere for this wavefront (solid red) determines relative actual wavefront deviation at any pupil height r normalized to 1, according to ρ3-2ρ/3 (Eq.12); for the axis of aberration, θ=0). For a given segment diameter 2Ωd, whose upper edge nearly coincides with that of the parent mirror, the P-V wavefront error with respect to the same reference sphere is identical to the P-V wavefront error over the entire radius d, equal to W=W1+W2. However, it has an obvious tilt element in regard to that reference sphere, which is centered at the best focus for the comatic wavefront as a whole. Best focus of the wavefront segment lies in a slightly different direction; in effect, it is shifted in respect to that of the parent mirror wavefront. Best reference sphere for the segment portion of the wavefront is the one centered at the segment's diffraction focus (dashed red). It is corrected for the tilt error, with the P-V error along the axis of aberration reduced to WΩ~W'+W". The segment wavefront radius shown is in the tangential (vertical) plane, thus determining the tangential astigmatic focus, slightly farther away from the pupil than sagittal focus, which is determined by the perpendicular wavefront radius (the focus is formed to the left, hence the convex to the left wavefront deformation indicates wavefront surface flatter than the reference sphere). Best focus lies midway between the tangential and sagittal foci of the wavefront segment, perhaps only slightly deviating from best focus location for pure astigmatism. Since the P-V error over the radius d is a sum of the peak errors for ρ=1 and ρ=0.47, the P-V wavefront error W over the segment is 0.81Wc , Wc being the coma P-V error over the entire parent mirror wavefront. However, with the respect to the reference sphere optimized for the tilt, the relative P-V wavefront error WΩ is smaller, approximated - for realistic Ω values of ~0.3 or greater - by WΩ~W'+W" (FIG. 61), with W' being the relative wavefront error for ρ=(1-2Ω), and W"=(W1-W3)/2 being the difference to the approximated relative wavefront error for the segment (W1 and W3 - absolute value - are obtained by substituting ρ=1 and ρ=(1-2Ω), respectively, for the normalized pupil height, into W1,2=ρ3-2ρ/3). As already mentioned, Ω is the relative segment diameter in units of the parent mirror diameter. The relative segment size Ω is limited by the number of segments cut out from the parent mirror. Usually, it is three or four which, for the theoretical limit given by Ωmax=1/(1+1/sinβ), with β=180/N in degrees, N being the number of equal-size segments cut out, gives the segment diameter ranging between 0.4 and 0.45 of the parent mirror diameter. Taking Ω=0.4, centered at ρ=0.6, gives mainly astigmatic P-V error for the segment wavefront W'~0.43Wc. This error is nearly 10% greater than the one given by the raytrace, the difference likely coming mainly due to the adjustment of the perfect reference sphere radius by the raytrace. Applying the 0.39 factor to the coma P-V wavefront error expression for the parent mirror (Eq. 70), gives a rough but usable estimate for the astigmatic P-V wavefront error of such mirror segment as: W'~ αD/123F2 or, alternately, W'~ h/123F3 (94) with α being the field angle, h the height in the image plane, D the parent mirror aperture diameter and F the parent mirror focal ratio number.
|