telescopeѲptics.net
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪▪▪▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪
▪ CONTENTS ◄ 1.1. Diffraction ▐ 1.2. Reflection and refraction ► 1.1. POINT SPREAD FUNCTION (PSF)As the previous page implies, diffraction of light in a perfect aperture is merely the limiting case of light interference from a circular area of wave emitters (which can be assumed as filling the telescope aperture), with wavefront aberrations and pupil obstructions approaching zero. Presence of significant wavefront aberrations, or pupil obstruction, alters wave interference and thus the intensity distribution and visual appearance of the diffraction pattern as well. In general, the effect is worsening of the image quality. And, as we've seen, even in the best possible scenario, i.e. in the absence of aberrations and pupil obstruction, the image of a point object is not a point. Rather, it is a pattern of energy distribution consisting of the bright central disc surrounded by rapidly fainting concentric rings. This is the diffraction image of a point source in a clear aberrationfree aperture. Its mathematical description is Point Spread Function (PSF), which expresses the normalized intensity distribution of the pointsource image (it should be noted that this diffraction PSF is different from the geometrical PSF, which is based on the distribution of rays in point image). The actual energy distribution of the pointobject image is given by a product of the PSF and the total power in the pupil. Before going to the properties of the diffraction PSF, briefly about the definition of a pointobject. In general, any object whose Gaussian (geometric) image is smaller than the central maxima of the diffraction pattern  Airy disc  is considered to be a pointsource. Be it physically as small as an atom, or as enormously large as a star. In other words, such object needs to feet into a cone outlined by drawing lines from the top and bottom of the Airy disc in the focal plane through the center of a pupil placed at the distance equal to the focal length in front of it. From similar triangles, pointsource needs to be smaller than sA/ƒ, s being the object distance, A the Airy disc diameter and ƒ the focal length. More accurately, according to the optical theory, a true pointsource has to be less than 1/4 of the Airy disc in diameter; larger source will appreciably modify the "perfect" PSF by enlarging the central maxima, and altering (suppressing) diffraction rings (at the image size of ~0.25 Airy disc diameter, the FWHM is enlarged ~2%, at twice that size it is about 8% larger, and with the source equaling the Airy disc in diameter the FWHM is nearly doubled, and the ring structure greatly suppressed).
This is a good example of why we do need to know, very specifically, where does the light energy go. And for that we need diffraction calculation, which integrates wave contribution from every point (actually, very small area) in the pupil to any point in the image space. This is, generally, described by some form of diffraction integral. By incorporating in such integral the effect of aberrations or pupil obstructions on the wave contribution to image points, such integral can also describe the effect of aberrations and obstructions on the energy distribution in the diffraction image. Those are the basics of physical optics. For now, we limit to the clear aberrationfree aperture. While the visual PSF simulation is informative to some extent, it is its exact mathematical description that enables us to determine performance limits set by a "perfect aperture". Conventionally accepted limit to the pointimage resolution set by diffraction equals the full width at halfmaximum (FWHM) of the diffraction PSF, given angularly by ~λ/D in radians (with 1 radian equaling 180/π degrees, the FWHM is 648,000λ/Dπ in arc seconds, or 180λ/Dπ in degrees), D being the aperture diameter, and λ the wavelength of light. For contrast and resolution of extended images, diffraction PSF is the basis for obtaining modulation (MTF) and contrast (CTF) transfer functions. Follow detailed description of the diffraction PSF and its properties.
INSET E: PSF of a clear aberrationfree aperture. Since the ring intensity is much lower than that of the central maxima, PSF is often graphically presented in logarithmic form, i.e. as log I(r) (blue). In the direction of light propagation, PSF is located at the point of longitudinal maxima, in the plane perpendicular to it. The longitudinal energy spread (red, top left) is very similar in form, given by a sinc function I(l)=(sinφ/φ)2, with φ  the variable on the horizontal scale  being one half of the nominal defocus phase error, the latter equaling the PV wavefront error in units of the wavelength multiplied by 2π (radians; so, φ=π equals 1 wave PV wavefront error). This normalized longitudinal intensity equals the Strehl, and reaches 1  same as the peak PSF value  at the focus location. The exact relation describing longitudinal energy spread includes multiplying factor (1+δ)2, where δ is the defocus in units of focal length; for most any telescope this factor can be neglected in the usual range of defocus error (note that this symmetrical longitudinal distribution is valid for Fresnel number value  given as N=D/4λF  of ~100 and larger, a condition easily fulfilled with any telescope). Intensity at any point of the pattern in the plane of focus for either coherent or nearmonochromatic incoherent pointsource, normalized to 1 for peak intensity at the center is given by:
with t=πr/2 (to simplify the relation), r being the point radius in the image plane, in units of λF (n!, the factorial, is a product of all integers smaller or equal to n; for example, 3!=3x2x1, and 5!=5x4x3x2x1). Note that the form of a term in the series can be generalized as tn/(0.5n)!(0.5n+1)!.
While straightforward, PSF calculation is cumbersome,
involving large numbers in both, numerator and denominator for
points farther from the center (up to the 3rd bright ring, 16 terms
in addition to 1 are needed, up to the 2nd 12, up to the 1st 8, and
for the central maxima four). Eq. (c) is derived from the general PSF relation
for circular aperture,
Alternately, point radius r in the image
plane can be expressed in terms of radians of the phase difference
corresponding to it, as rR=(kDsinα)/2=rπ,
where k=2π/λ
is the wave propagation number (expressing the number of cycles
in radians per mm),
While Eq. (c) implies that the linear, or
transverse size of diffraction pattern changes in proportion to the
telescope's
with a=πDsinα/2, in units of λ, where D is the aperture diameter and α the angular point height in the image plane. Obviously, a is numerically identical to t, so for the first minima (Airy disc radius), the corresponding function value is 2a=πDsinα/λ=1.22π, with sinα=1.22λ/D (which is for very small angles identical to the angle in radians), changing in inverse proportion with the aperture diameter. Or, quite simply, α=rλF/ƒ=rλ/D in radians. For D=100mm and λ=0.00055mm, angular radius of the first minima (r=1.22) is α=1.22∙0.00055/100=0.00000671 in radians or, multiplied by 206,265 (for 180/π degrees in 1 radian x 60 arc minutes in 1 degree x 60 arc seconds in 1 arc minute), 1.384 arc seconds. The diameter of the first PSF minima, given by 2.44λF linearly and 2.44λ/D angularly (in radians)  λ being the wavelength of light, and F the ratio of focal length vs. aperture D of the optical system  is called Airy disc diameter. With the normalized (to 1) encircled energy (EE) within pattern radius r in units of λF given by
(sum in the brackets being zeroorder
Bessel function, J0(πr),
and t=πr/2,
as before), it encircles 0.838 of the total energy contained in the
diffraction pattern. Note that I(r)t2
= [J1(πr)]2,
or the As the PSF and EE plots illustrate, the value of normalized encircled energy within 1st maxima is nearly inverse to the normalized intensity for r<0.8. Thus the encircled energy within 1st maxima, as a relative fraction of the total energy encircled within it, is well approximated as EE~1I for r smaller than ~0.8. Taking Gaussian approximation of I, which is also good for r<0.8 gives EE~12P, with P=3.77r2.
Following table gives numerical presentation of
the intensity distribution up to 10th dark ring within diffraction
pattern in nearmonochromatic light by aberrationfree unobstructed
aperture, for linear radius r in units of λF, normalized
intensity (I) and encircled energy (EE)
(source: Optical Imaging and Aberrations 2, Mahajan).
Conventionally, the limit to
diffraction resolution
of two pointobject images is set at ~λ/D, nearly identical to the
Wave interference doesn't only occur radially; wavelets meeting before and after the focal point also interfere, extending the pattern of intensity longitudinally, generally decreasing as the interference takes place farther from the focal point. As a result, diffraction pattern is a 3dimensional phenomenon. While relative intensities of the central disc vs. rings remain constant, as given above, visual appearance of diffraction pattern  the visibility of its segments, as well as their apparent size and relative apparent brightness  varies with the brightness of the point image. Intensity distribution within the 1st PSF maxima (the bellshaped central portion) is well approximated for r~0.8 and smaller by a Gaussian function of the form I~2P, with P=(x2+y2)/r'2, where x and y are the point coordinates in horizontal plane (zero at the center), and r' the FWHM (fullwidthathalfmaximum) radius, both in units of λF. Substituting for FWHM radius r'~1 and setting y to zero, with x effectively becoming r as defined with Eq. (c), gives the exponent for 2D Gaussian central maxima approximation as P=3.77r2. For r>1 , Gaussian approximation asymptotically approaches horizontal axis, without any hint of the ring structure. Following table gives actual and approximated values for intensity distribution within central maxima of unobstructed aberrationfree aperture:
Note that this Gaussian is optimized for the best fit close to the center. Slightly different Gaussians can give better overall fit. The relative irradiance intensity distribution given by Eq. (c) applies to both, coherent and nearmonochromatic incoherent light, since the light emitted by a pointsource is also coherent if nearmonochromatic. But there is important difference between the two in how the energy is generated, which is the reason for presenting spread function in its two distinct forms  the coherent spread function (CSF), given by the Bessel function in brackets of Eq. (c), and incoherent PSF, equal to the coherent spread function squared (calling PSF "incoherent" may be somewhat confusing, since it is essentially an image of coherent pointobject; the rationale is in this energy distribution function being the building block of the image of an incoherent object).
With coherent light, due to constant phase relationship between individual waves, contributing amplitudes at each image point  the image being produced by overlapping CSF from every object point  first add up, and the intensity is this complex amplitude squared. With incoherent light, individual waves randomly vary in phase, preventing constructive amplitude interference; rather, individual wave intensities, as their individual amplitudes squared, add up at every image point directly as intensity contributions (INSET G). Hence, irradiance intensity of the diffraction image for given flux density is proportional to the square of pupil area for the former, and to the pupil area for the latter. This does not affect the relative intensity distribution of the pointobject image (PSF), which are identical for either coherent or nearmonochromatic incoherent light, but does result in a different intensity distribution for extended object image, as well as close pointobject images. While such extended image in coherent light forms by summing up and squaring complex amplitude to obtain the energy (illuminance, equaling complex amplitude squared) at every point of the image, with incoherent light it is directly a sum of illuminance (energy) contributions at every image point, i.e. sum of pointimages of object points (the reason being that coherent waves are correlated in phase, thus building up complex amplitude, while incoherent waves oscillate independently and only interfere at the energy level). As plots at right show, this difference in wave interference between the two will result in a different image characteristics of the same object. A three pointsource object shown on top is partly resolved in incoherent light, but not in coherent (bottom). INSET H: While, according to Van CittertZernike Theorem, star light is coherent in amateur apertures, if near monochromatic, the actual (polychromatic) star light is closer to incoherent, and its PSF indicates somewhat different diffraction pattern, as shown below (light from extended astronomical objects is always incoherent). The central maxima is slightly expanded, and the rings are less pronounced, particularly beyond the first 23 bright rings. Encircled energy is somewhat lower due to enlarged central maxima, but nearly equilizes with that for monochromatic light farther out, due to more energy packed up in the dark ring areas.
However, considering that intensity differences are grossly magnified on logarithmic scale, the change in both, pattern appearance and energy distribution are still negligible at Δλ=0.1λm, and relatively small at Δλ=0.0.25λm (FIG. 100 bottom). The latter still displaces much less energy than 1/4 wave PV of primary spherical, as can be seen comparing its graph with FIG. 95, right. Still, its polychromatism makes the starlight partly incoherent (i.e. closer to incoherent than coherent state), and that from extended objects incoherent (Van CittertZernike Theorem). Stars do act as sources of incoherent light, since the limiting magnitude is dependant on the aperture area (i.e. flux), implying that their light is linear in intensity; with coherent light, limiting magnitude changes with the square of aperture area. INSET I: The logarithmic PSF more closely resembles visual appearance of diffraction pattern, due to the (approximately) logarithmic intensity response of the eye. However, since logarithm (exponent) to the base 10 is different than the assumed eye response logarithm base for pointobject (1000.2~2.512), it compresses nominal differences more, as illustrated on FIG. 13. Diffraction pattern of a point source, as it appears to the eye is better represented with the plot to the left ("apparent PSF"), modified according to eye's intensity response. It should approximate well appearance of the pattern when both, central maxima and 1st bright ring are well within eye's detection threshold, and the pattern intensity is not too high. As the pattern intensity lowers, the ring appears increasingly fainter than central maxima, and eventually disappears. On the other hand, as pattern's intensity increases, the ring becomes nearly as bright as central disc, probably due to saturation of retinal photoreceptors.
The above refers to diffraction at a circular
aperture. Aperture forms other than circular will produce different
diffraction patterns. Two examples are square and triangular
aperture, with their PSF, MTF and diffraction patterns shown bellow
(1)Actual
astronomical pointsources  stars  are spatially extended, with the
wave emission phase varying from one point to another, and also in time.
Thus, strictly talking, they emit incoherent
light. However, according to Van CittertZernike Theorem 
stating that the degree of spatial coherence of nearmonochromatic light
equals the normalized (to 1) PSF of the source  the degree of coherence
between two wave trains from a star will diminish from 1 to 0 as their
angular separation in the image plane increases from zero to 1.22λ/S,
where S is their separation in the aperture. In other words, the
complex degree of coherence
ɤ
for a star of angular size A in radians is 1 for two points in
the aperture nearly coinciding, diminishing to zero as their linear
separation increases to 1.22λ/A.
Hence even the largest star angularly, Betelgeuse (slightly less than
0.045 arc seconds in diameter @550nm), would have its
ɤ
value change only from 1 to over 0.99 for two rays from the opposite
ends of S=D=200mm aperture (1.38 arc seconds Airy disc diameter). On the
other hand, Jupiter with its average 40 arc seconds angular diameter
would have
ɤ
falling from 1 to 0 already at nearly 1/60 of its radius. Since
boundary waves become incoherent when angular radius of the object
equals that of the Airy disc  assuming, for simplicity, circular object
 the corresponding aperture (so called "coherence radius") is given by
Dc=1.22λ/A
for the object's angular diameter A in radians, or Dc=251,643λ/A,
for A in arc seconds, with Dc
being in the same units as λ (when two slits are placed at
separation equaling
D, the fringes in their interference pattern disappear, which is
how Michelson had determined first angular diameter of a star 
Betelgeuse, from
Dc=3070mm
for λ=0.00057mm). At this point, the average coherence, as the averaged
ɤ
value, equals intensity averaged
over the Airy disc (as flux divided by area, normalized to
the central intensity), which is 0.23 for perfect aperture.
Hence, it is a lowcoherence, partly incoherent light. Note
that Van CittertZernike Theorem strictly
applies to nearmonochromatic light, so the fact that stars are
polychromatic sources also needs to be taken into account. As
Inset H shows, widening of the spectral range lowers light
coherency, until it becomes incoherent as the range
approaches the mean wavelength. ◄ 1.1. Diffraction ▐ 1.2. Reflection and refraction ►
