telescopeѲptics.net
.......................................................................................... CONTENTS
2.2. Telescope resolution
Resolution is another
vital telescope function. Simply put, telescope resolution it is the limit to how small a
detail can be detected in the image it forms. In the absence of
aberrations, what determines limit to resolution is
the effect of diffraction. Being subject to eye perception, resolution varies with detail's shape, contrast,
brightness and wavelength.
The conventional indicator of resolving power - commonly called
diffraction resolution limit - is somewhat arbitrarily set forth by
the wave theory as ~λ/D
in radians, λ
being the wavelength of light, and D the aperture diameter (expressed in
arc seconds, it is 13.4/D for D in mm, or 4.5/D for D in inches,
both for 550nm wavelength).
Linearly, diffraction resolution
limit is given by ~λF,
F
being the ratio number of the focal length to aperture diameter (F=f/D).
Specifically, this is a limit to resolution of two point object images
of near-equal intensity (FIG.
7). Resolution limit can vary significantly with other object
types (FIG. 8).

FIGURE 7: Diffraction limit to resolution of two close point-object
images: best resolution is possible when the two are of near equal,
optimum intensity. As the two PSF
merge closer, the intensity deep between them rapidly diminishes. At the
center separation of half the Airy disc diameter - 1.22λ/D
radians (138/D in arc seconds, for λ=0.55μ and the aperture
diameter D in mm), known as Rayleigh limit
- the deep is at nearly 3/4 of the peak intensity. Reducing the separation
to λ/D (113.4/D in arc seconds for D in mm, or 4.466/D for
D in inches, both for λ=0.55μ) brings the intensity deep only ~4% bellow
the peak. This is the conventional diffraction
resolution limit, nearly identical to the empirical double
star resolution limit, known as Dawes' limit.
With even slight further reduction in the separation, the contrast deep
disappears, and the two spurious discs merge together. The separation at
which the intensity flattens at the top is called
Sparrow's limit, given by 107/D for D in mm, and
4.2/D for D in inches (λ=0.55μ).
Peak intensities of the
two point-object images on Fig. 7 remain unchanged at the central
separation of 1.22λ/D, and larger. At smaller separations (smaller
the Rayleigh limit), the two peak
intensities start to increase, at first slowly, then rather fast,
with the combined intensity doubling as the two point-objects merge (this means that the left plot,
illustrating two PSFs at Dawes' limit would be actually slightly higher if not
normalized, with the initial peak intensity being at the level of the
minima between the two peaks). The combined intensity of the two
patterns (normalized to peak intensity of the point-object images) at
any point is given by Ic=I'+I",
with I' calculated from the PSF
intensity profile relation for p'=(x-s/2)π/2,
and I" for p"=(x+s/2)π/2,
x being the point coordinate on the horizontal axis (with zero at
the mid point between two PSF centeroids), and s being the
pattern center separation, both in units of λF.
The separation at which
the combined PSF flattens at the top occurs at the center separation
107/D in arc seconds, for D in mm (4.2/D for D in inches).
It is so called Sparrow's limit,
allowing detection of close doubles based on visual elongation of
the bright central spot of diffraction pattern. For closer separations, peak
intensity of the combined pattern forms at the mid point
between two Gaussian point-object images.
As mentioned, this
limit applies to near-equally bright, contrasty point-object images at
the optimum intensity level. Resolution limit for star pairs of unequal
brightness, or those significantly above or bellow the optimum intensity
level is lower. For other image forms, resolution limit also can and
does deviate significantly, both, above and bellow the conventional
limit. One example is a dark line on light background, whose diffraction
image is defined with the images of the two bright edges enclosing it.
These images are defined with the Edge Spread Function (ESF), whose
configuration differs significantly from the PSF (FIG. 8). With
its intensity drop within the main sequence being, on the other hand,
quite similar to that of the PSF, resolution of this kind of detail is
more likely to be limited by detector sensitivity, than by diffraction
(in the sense that the intensity differential for the mid point between
Gaussian images of the edges vs. intensity peaks, forms a non-zero
contrast differential for any finite edge separation).

FIGURE 8: Limits to
diffraction resolution can vary
significantly with a form of the object. Image of a dark line on
bright background is determined by diffraction images of the two bright edges,
described by the Edge Spread Function (ESF). As the illustration shows,
the gap between two intensity profiles at
λ/D
separation is much larger for the ESF than PSF
(which is nearly identical to the Line Spread Function). It implicates
resolution considerably better than
λ/D,
which agrees with practical observations (Cassini division, Moon riles).
Gradual intensity falloff at the top of the intensity curve around the
edges can produce very subtle low-contrast features, even if the line
itself remains invisible.
Formal premises and experimental results on telescopic resolution
are covered in detail in Amateur Astronomer's Handbook from J.B. Sidgwick (p37-51). Naturally, resolution in general
will deteriorate with introduction of wavefront aberrations.
◄
2.1. Light-gathering power
▐
2.3. Telescope magnification
►
Home
| Comments |