|
telescopeѲptics.net .......................................................................................... CONTENTS
6.5. MTF 2
FIGURE 46 (continued):
(e) Turned down
edge
effect on the PSF and MTF. The P-V errors for 95% zone are
2.5 and 5 waves as needed for the initial 0.80 Strehl (the RMS is
similarly out of proportion). Lost energy is more evenly spread out,
and the central disc becomes enlarged. Odd but expected TE property
- due to the relatively small area of the wavefront affected - is
that further increase beyond 0.80 Strehl error level does almost no
additional damage.
(f) The effect of ~1/14 and ~1/7 wave RMS wavefront
error of
roughness, resulting in the peak intensity and contrast
drop similar to those with other aberrations. Due to the random
nature of the aberration, its nominal P-V wavefront error can vary
significantly for a given RMS error and image quality level. Shown
is the medium-scale roughness ("primary ripple" or "dog biscuit", in
amateur mirror makers' jargon) effect. (g) 0.37 and 0.74 wave
P-V of wavefront error caused by pinching
having the typical
(i) Near-average PSF/MTF effect of ~1/14
and ~1/7 wave RMS wavefront error of
atmospheric turbulence. The atmosphere caused error
fluctuates constantly, and so do image contrast and resolution
level. Larger seeing errors (1/7 wave RMS is rather common with
medium-to-large apertures) result in a drop of contrast in the mid-
and high-frequency range to near-zero level.
|